The program objectives were met: Identified and listed key characteristics of the premeditated assault face.
The program objectives were met: Identified and listed key characteristics of the loss of impulse control face.
The program objectives were met: Provided an opportunity to demonstrate the ability to differentiate between faces associated with dangerous intent and other emotions.
The program objectives were met: Provided an opportunity to proficiently recognize behavioral signatures of imminent attack in others within seconds.
Content was appropriate for postdoctoral level training.
Instruction at a level appropriate to postdoctoral level training.
Teaching methods were effective.
Program made clearly evident, prior to registration, the following: Commercial support for CE program, sponsor, or instructor (or any other relationship that could reasonably be construed as a conflict of interest)
Program made clearly evident, prior to registration, the following: Requirements for successful completion of activity
Program made clearly evident, prior to registration, the following: Commercial support for content of instruction (e.g., research grants funding research findings) that could be construed as a conflict of interest
Program made clearly evident, prior to registration, the following: Commercial support or benefit for endorsement of products (e.g., books, training, drugs, etc.)
Program made clearly evident, prior to registration, the following: Accuracy and utility of the materials presented, the basis of such statements, the limitations of the content being taught and the severe and most common risks
Learning: Information could be applied to my practice or other work context
Learning: Information could contribute to achieving personal or professional goals.
Learning: Issues of diversity were addressed
Learning: Cultural, racial, ethnic, socioeconomic, and gender differences were considered.
Learning: How much did you learn as a result of this CE program?
Learning: How useful was the content of this CE program for your practice or other professional development?
Learning: This program enhanced my professional expertise
Learning: I would recommend this program to others
Learning was enhanced through a variety of media utilizing auditory, visual, and multimedia formats
The presentation facilitated the integration and synthesis of information
Participant Information
Please note years in your profession
What was your overall impression of the activity? What went well? What could have been improved?
What did you learn that was new or different? How and/or will this information change how you practice?